From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Pinard?= <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: New exporter [was: Re: Using Org for a dissertation]
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 23:56:32 -0400
Message-ID: <86sjeujifj.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
References: <87aa1dz2b5.fsf@berkeley.edu> <m1zk9dp5cb.fsf@tsdye.com>
	<3446.1337059016@ludwig> <87aa19l6df.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55741)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SWJja-0008AO-22
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 23:56:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SWJjX-0008Ij-B1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 23:56:37 -0400
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:50449
	helo=mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SWJjX-0008IJ-5V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 23:56:35 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.coma> writes:

> Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> writes:

>> I have seen mention of the new exporter on this list a bit [...] How
>> can I try it [...]?

> Assuming contrib directory is in your load-path, just evaluate
>   (require 'org-export)

It would be that simple?  This is surely worth a try then!

Well, I'm quickly encountering a few problems.  Are my tries premature,
or should I push to get it going nevertheless?  In the latter case, I
would be reporting problems as a mere user, as I do not feel I have
enough free time to dive and debug myself (it is common nowadays that
maintainers, everywhere, are trying to pull users into maintenance).  If
this is acceptable, should I report to this list or privately to
someone?

Fran=C3=A7ois