From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Jones Subject: Re: Org and Muse Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:23:51 -0600 Message-ID: <86r6czc8qg.fsf@pmade.com> References: <0t63ubqlwf.fsf@richardriley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1cs-00036i-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:24:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1cq-00035y-7k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:24:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1cq-00035q-4h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:24:28 -0400 Received: from pmade.com ([64.92.223.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jo1cp-0007Ip-Ro for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:24:28 -0400 Received: from beefy.local.pmade.com (75-166-98-176.hlrn.qwest.net [75.166.98.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by pmade.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3LJNvbI091300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:23:58 GMT (envelope-from pjones@pmade.com) In-Reply-To: <0t63ubqlwf.fsf@richardriley.net> (Richard G. Riley's message of "Mon\, 21 Apr 2008 17\:15\:44 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard G Riley writes: > I just dug out some old Muse documents I had and am now wondering what > overlap exists, if any, between Muse and Org. As a committed Org user > should I migrate these Muse projects to Org projects? Any thoughts > appreciated. Possibly I have the wrong end of the stick with regard to > org publishing and the two should live together? I use both Org and Muse. There is a bit of overlap, so sometimes it's hard for me to choose one over the other when creating a new document. I don't use org publishing, so that makes it a bit easier. I use Org for all my planning and time tracking, and Muse for any document that I intend to publish and release to some sort of audience. Muse projects and publishing styles are very powerful, along with a very intuitive markup syntax. That's why I prefer Muse over Org publish. But I can understand your desire to move all your old Muse documents to Org. At least once a day I think to myself how incredible Org is. It's easily one of the best software packages I've ever used. -- Peter Jones, pmade inc. http://pmade.com