* Bug: org-backward-paragraph give an error when called from the #+BEGIN_SRC line of a source block [9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpaplus @ /home/omar/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171002/)]
@ 2017-10-03 19:56 Omar Antolin
2017-10-04 11:00 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Omar Antolin @ 2017-10-03 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
If you run `org-backward-paragraph` from the `#+BEGIN_SRC` line of a
source block it gives the error message "Invalid search bound (wrong
side of point)", instead of moving point.
I tried tracking it down and this error message comes from a call to
`re-search-backward` in the source for `org-backward-paragraph`:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(when (re-search-backward "^[ \t]*$" contents-begin 'move)
(skip-chars-forward " \r\t\n" origin)
(if (= (point) origin) (goto-char contents-begin)
(beginning-of-line)))
#+END_SRC
This excerpt is from inside a branch of a `cond` that tests for
`(memq type '(src-block verse-block))`. I don't really understand what
the code is trying to do or why the case of source blocks and verse
block should be handled together.
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.9)
of 2017-09-20 on lcy01-07, modified by Debian
Package: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/24.5/lisp/org/)
current state:
==============
(setq
org-tab-first-hook '(org-hide-block-toggle-maybe
org-src-native-tab-command-maybe
org-babel-hide-result-toggle-maybe
org-babel-header-arg-expand)
org-speed-command-hook '(org-speed-command-default-hook
org-babel-speed-command-hook)
org-occur-hook '(org-first-headline-recenter)
org-metaup-hook '(org-babel-load-in-session-maybe)
org-confirm-shell-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
org-after-todo-state-change-hook '(org-clock-out-if-current)
org-src-mode-hook '(org-src-babel-configure-edit-buffer
org-src-mode-configure-edit-buffer)
org-agenda-before-write-hook '(org-agenda-add-entry-text)
org-babel-pre-tangle-hook '(save-buffer)
org-mode-hook '(#[nil "\300\301\302\303\304$\207"
[org-add-hook change-major-mode-hook org-show-block-all
append local]
5]
#[nil "\300\301\302\303\304$\207"
[org-add-hook change-major-mode-hook
org-babel-show-result-all append local]
5]
org-babel-result-hide-spec org-babel-hide-all-hashes)
org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook '(org-babel-hash-at-point
org-babel-execute-safely-maybe)
org-cycle-hook '(org-cycle-hide-archived-subtrees org-cycle-hide-drawers
org-cycle-hide-inline-tasks org-cycle-show-empty-lines
org-optimize-window-after-visibility-change)
org-confirm-elisp-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
org-metadown-hook '(org-babel-pop-to-session-maybe)
org-clock-out-hook '(org-clock-remove-empty-clock-drawer)
)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-backward-paragraph give an error when called from the #+BEGIN_SRC line of a source block [9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpaplus @ /home/omar/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171002/)]
2017-10-03 19:56 Bug: org-backward-paragraph give an error when called from the #+BEGIN_SRC line of a source block [9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpaplus @ /home/omar/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171002/)] Omar Antolin
@ 2017-10-04 11:00 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2017-10-04 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Omar Antolin; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Omar Antolin <omar.antolin@gmail.com> writes:
> If you run `org-backward-paragraph` from the `#+BEGIN_SRC` line of a
> source block it gives the error message "Invalid search bound (wrong
> side of point)", instead of moving point.
Fixed. Thank you.
> This excerpt is from inside a branch of a `cond` that tests for
> `(memq type '(src-block verse-block))`. I don't really understand what
> the code is trying to do or why the case of source blocks and verse
> block should be handled together.
Because we want to treat their contents differently than what the parser
sees. For example, source blocks have no contents, and verse blocks'
ignore blank lines.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-04 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-03 19:56 Bug: org-backward-paragraph give an error when called from the #+BEGIN_SRC line of a source block [9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpaplus @ /home/omar/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171002/)] Omar Antolin
2017-10-04 11:00 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).