From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard)
Subject: Re: Old mailto: notation?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:41:00 -0400
Message-ID: <86mx6155xf.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
References: <86r4vd5hbt.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57629)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SMkfj-0000rS-Py
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:41:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SMkff-0001hA-4A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:41:07 -0400
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:64266
	helo=mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SMkfe-0001db-UK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:41:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <86r4vd5hbt.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Fran=C3=A7ois?=
	Pinard"'s message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:34:46 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard) writes:

> Is there some easy way to get Org to read and understand the older
> "<user@domain.name>" notation as meaning the same as the equivalent
> "mailto:user@domain.name" notation, and then, of course, behaving like
> it?  Or else, should I rather just forget about the old notation, give
> in, and turn all occurrences to mailto:s?

Hi, everybody.  Sorry for my noise.

I finally did the later, and now use "mailto:" about everywhere.  With a
few Emacs keyboard macros and some patience, it was easily done. :-) The
way Org supports "mailto:" already seems to be worth the change!

Fran=C3=A7ois