From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Pinard?= Subject: Re: GFDL Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:03:27 -0400 Message-ID: <86mwrogytc.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> References: <878v5wwr96.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <6D1B3E63-A3F0-447E-A1F4-12F8B3156DB9@gmail.com> <513BD73C.3050704@gmail.com> <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> <7wbo85qh62.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87vc6ceigf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86ppwkij9r.fsf@somewhere.org> <86r4h0h2y8.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <1B9EEC55-EB84-480D-8EEE-8CFAB14D6264@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ueo65-0003Zf-JG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 11:03:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ueo64-0007Tp-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 11:03:29 -0400 Received: from bureau.ubity.com ([64.254.249.42]:51406 helo=mercure.bureau.ubity.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ueo64-0007Tb-5f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 11:03:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1B9EEC55-EB84-480D-8EEE-8CFAB14D6264@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 21 May 2013 16:18:44 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > I am curious, what passage does make such restrictions possible, and > which kinds of restrictions? Oh, I did not read the GFDL in quite a years, and really have no interest in diving and scrutinizing it again :-). More away I am from all this, better I feel :-). Sorry, just forget I've written this morning, I was likely in some strange mood. I do love the FSF idea and theory, and supported the GNU project in an intense way for maybe more than twenty years. But by now, in practice, I just cannot stand their slightest abuse, anymore. I'm all for programming freedom, but this ought to include programmer freedom too! Fran=C3=A7ois