From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao-Yong Jin Subject: Re: Another GTD question. Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:21:47 -0400 Message-ID: <86hcxvsdis.fsf@presario.homeunix.org> References: <76f7cd71190bcff68e57e71d163fe49f@science.uva.nl> <3c12eb8d0610041011g22dda93ahf42608e6482f8c77@mail.gmail.com> <453A8918.4090405@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbu8I-0003gm-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:22:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbu8G-0003c3-B0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:22:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbu8G-0003bc-2D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:22:00 -0400 Received: from [128.59.29.6] (helo=serrano.cc.columbia.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gbu8G-0001YK-1O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:22:00 -0400 Received: from presario.homeunix.org (dyn-carl-201-39.dyn.columbia.edu [160.39.201.39]) (user=xj2106 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9N7Lpx1025997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:21:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:10:35 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > >> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained. >> It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little >> nifty features that you can use to manage and organize information (to >> tasks, or whatever) and use can use any subset you want. You can >> learn it incrementally. (...as I have. It sound popular but I >> haven't even touched the publishing...) None of the features really >> require the use of any other feature except maybe agenda and agenda is >> just a flexible interface for gathering the information marked and >> managed by the other features. (Dates, tags, Todo state...) Yet all >> of the features work well together. There's more that one way to do >> most things. > > I am smiling happily at this description, it reflects very much of > what I am trying to do with org-mode. > > - Carsten I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and more text markups? Xiao-Yong -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo---