From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Subject: Re: Elisp programming style Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:59:48 +0200 Message-ID: <86fwidqf7v.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <86obx2gvmd.fsf@googlemail.com> <8762j94dz0.fsf@gmail.com> <86obx1qkcc.fsf@googlemail.com> <18647.1319812286@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJoqc-0004dO-Kd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:59:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJoqb-0007Jn-LF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:59:58 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJoqb-0007Jj-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:59:57 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJoqa-0004JY-26 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:59:56 +0200 Received: from g231224198.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.224.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:59:56 +0200 Received: from quintfall by g231224198.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:59:56 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Not a problem - you can't predict the future. You do the best you can > with your current knowledge. You can always refactor in the future: > that's one reason that having the source code around is important. When > you refactor, you may be cursing the original author for the "bad" > decicions, but c'est la vie: at least, you have chosen a system where > *you* can do that and not depend on a third party: they might not even > be alive, let alone willing to do what you want. Thats really great about Emacs lisp - everything is so easily accessible, it seems like no big deal to change something. I still have to get rid of the reflex to factor out every duplication of code that I see. Lisp is not Java... cheers -- Thorsten