From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Pinard?= Subject: Re: Rudel - Real-Time collaborative editing of Org-Mode files Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:47:41 -0500 Message-ID: <86d2xasbjm.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> References: <50D4AF62.2020401@gmail.com> <87txrcxq14.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86licmclle.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <86han9dho5.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87k3s4ij3m.fsf@gmail.com> <86r4mcz18p.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu2N8-0003Zb-Fi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:47:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu2N4-0006CQ-Tq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:47:46 -0500 Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:56464 helo=mercure.bureau.ubity.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu2N4-0006CK-OZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:47:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Torben Hoffmann's message of "Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:04:31 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Torben Hoffmann Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Torben Hoffmann writes: > Not sure if it would be speedy enough, but gitit [...] Thanks for the pointer! :-) > Inventing a protocol to deal with synchronisation is not trivial, so a > good starting point might be gitit or raw git with the intention of > learning about what the real issues are before creating a system from > scratch to solve what might not be the right problem to solve. I tried to see a bit how to get hold on a synchronization protocol which would be easy to use, and have been overwhelmed so far by the complexity of the specifications, and also the implementations I quickly looked at. I really want something simple enough for me to grasp (you know, I've short limits!), and would be rather willing and ready to compromise on the generality or speed, in the sake of simplicity. So, inventing a protocol is still an avenue which I naively seek, and for which I dared giving some thought recently, trying to stay on the side of simplicity. > I have not used org enough to be able to judge these issues, but I > would like to have a good multi-user solution since org seems to be > one of the better ways to collaborate. Sigh! Yes! :-) Fran=C3=A7ois