From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:56:19 +0100 Message-ID: <86bnjkw0r0.fsf@example.com> References: <87iodtuutc.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Rasmus wrote: > Andreas Leha writes: >> >> If there are `#+latex_header:' entries in a section and that section is >> `COMMENT'ed out, I'd expect the #+latex_header entries to be >> uneffective. As they are when I comment them out one by one as in >> `# #+latex_header:'. >> >> Is this a bug? (I'd say, yes....) > > Why? I guess you can still archive I'd also say that this is a bug, as -- in my understanding -- COMMENT'ing a subtree is exactly equivalent to commenting every line of it, that is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * COMMENT Section Some text Some code Some text --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- should be equivalent to: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- # * Section # Some text # Some code # Some text --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban