From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Rogers Subject: Re: Does Org support Related or "See Also" Properties? Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: <868v4cxqiw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877gjyas3m.fsf@debian.home> <87r4i5zn9e.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqrx9i7w.fsf@debian.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTpBm-0007UY-1s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:59:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTpBl-0006JK-46 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:59:57 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]:47511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTpBk-0006J7-Tv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:59:57 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p8so2459734dan.14 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wqrx9i7w.fsf@debian.home> (Nick M. Daly's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:20:51 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Nick M. Daly" writes: > Hi Bastien, thanks for the prompt reply. > > Bastien writes: > >>> When exported into an agenda, the consolidated org agenda would read: >>> >>> Friday 19 April 2013 >>> customer: 09:00-09:30 Scheduled: TODO Meeting with Pete >> >> The problem is: what would RET do on this agenda line? Go to which >> entry? You can always put some hacks in `org-agenda-finalize-hook' >> but it's easier to try to keep your Org files clean ;) > > I would assume that RET would jump to the source item (the one with the > "See also" property). If I were using this, I would forget to mark any "See also", or else I would do it, and forget I had already done so, and end up marking _both_ of them "See also". :) Knowing that you have an entry elsewhere for this person or that event, might give you the opportunity to do some kind of clever tricks with links... -- David R