From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Jones Subject: Re: Possible Bug in Table Calculations? Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 08:35:43 -0600 Message-ID: <867idu1fls.fsf@pmade.com> References: <86d4nn4cpy.fsf@pmade.com> <2FB83005-88B1-4EC0-B8C8-67ED62FE3EC9@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx12o-0008Bl-Dm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 10:36:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx12m-0008AX-Iy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 10:36:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39631 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx12m-0008AM-1U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 10:36:24 -0400 Received: from pmade.com ([64.92.223.213]:53696) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jx12l-0005kI-Cq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 10:36:23 -0400 Received: from beefy.local.pmade.com (75-166-107-167.hlrn.qwest.net [75.166.107.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by pmade.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4GEaKYY068151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:36:21 GMT (envelope-from pjones@pmade.com) In-Reply-To: <2FB83005-88B1-4EC0-B8C8-67ED62FE3EC9@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri\, 16 May 2008 09\:39\:05 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > Currently, Org uses cals with only 5 significant digits, this is the > cause for this accuracy. You can change this per equation by > including something like "n8" or "f8" into the mode string, like > > @5$1=vsum(@2..@-1);n8%.2f Ah, I totally glossed over the n8 format. Thanks. > Maybe I should actually do this by default. Yes, I wil, do so. > Better questions about too wide fields than inaccurate calculations. I agree, and thanks! -- Peter Jones, pmade inc. http://pmade.com