From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [RFC] Syntax for macros Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:29:05 +0100 Message-ID: <867g9hiwzy.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86ha8n6ulq.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y51zta1a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> This would be much more easy to read, IMO: >> >> This {hlt(information)} is important. > > But more prone to false positives. Because of the grouping for sub/super-scripts? >> Would this be possible? If so, would you want that as well? > > Reducing to {{...}} could be better, but I'm not sure this is > what will make your friends happy :) Not entirely, no! But I think that'd be already a good simplification. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban