From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:32:45 +0100 Message-ID: <864n4n10rm.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87ob33nnwi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh3yvgyg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <3bc3c5a1-1c3f-4975-9dd6-3428aabb69be@default> <87ppniu06o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1c11f795-ca4a-45bf-9701-7645a0609ed1@default> <87lhy6l4k4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2jh93jb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bnywtqx4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86lhxz6uw8.fsf@somewhere.org> <87lhxzt9dy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86bnyv2hze.fsf@somewhere.org> <8761p3dpe4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> Is it really important to have a couple less of "not >> standard" key bindings, if we still have others which don't comply? > > I think so, as it reduces the chances of conflicting keybindings from > other minor modes. OK. I (can) agree. But not changing them all will make it even more complex for our little heads... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban