From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: \newpage in HTML export Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 20:47:46 +0100 Message-ID: <8638l3zfz1.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <8738moubd4.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738mo68fi.fsf@gmail.com> <3389069.jUrlGMUlNA@descartes> <87a9gu6t92.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3fym54f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87li0dvr4d.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87wqixhu66.fsf@gmail.com> <871u0pcbw0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwjckgnf.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87iou0kes4.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Andreas Leha wrote: >> Could you expand on what you mean by "less portable"? I'm interested in >> portability from a reproducible research perspective and want to avoid >> habits that don't port well to other researchers' systems. >> > > I did not want to include these words in the first place. The words 'less > portable' are too strong here. > > You won't be affected, since you ship your emacs / Org configuration > with the document, IIUC. (Which is the only possible way to achieve > something like reproducibility with Org...) > In that case you can simply include such a filter in that configuration. > > The non-portable part comes from the need to share that filter. > Anybody without that filter will not be able to export your document in > the intended way. Shouldn't, then, some filters be available by default in core Org? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban