From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package? Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:49:46 +0200 Message-ID: <861u4t5cnp.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87ob7z4nzl.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <877gentvmv.fsf@gmx.us> <87wqmmos25.fsf@gmail.com> <878uz151r5.fsf@pank.sbde-40904.btopenzone.com> <87ob7xq30v.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > My point is: if "wrapfig" is there, "rotating" should accompany it, or > both should be removed from the variable. Also, there's no reason for > "longtable" to be included. Your analysis makes a lot of sense (somehow looking at what LaTeX knowledge the user has, if he writes `longtabu' in his document). However, I am undecided about doing it the way you propose here above, and having "all" of them included by default. Hence, I'll be happy with whichever proposition you apply. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban