From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: noweb
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:58:21 +0100
Message-ID: <84v9p2vc2q.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87sgk7qnxb.fsf@nulle1.home> <841rrrz1hu.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87d0bbqbq8.fsf@nulle1.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48127)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>) id 1iuXNh-0007A3-TA
 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 02:58:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>) id 1iuXNh-0004Hm-05
 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 02:58:25 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:39048)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>)
 id 1iuXNg-0004HE-QP
 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 02:58:24 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 20so1439155wmj.4
 for <Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:58:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87d0bbqbq8.fsf@nulle1.home> (Nuno Salgado's message of "Thu, 23
 Jan 2020 00:04:47 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Nuno Salgado <nuno@salgado.eu>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nuno Salgado <nuno@salgado.eu> writes:

> My question was to figure out what's the point to tangle the code
> without substituition!

Your imagination is the limit.  E.g. this could be useful to document
the ":noweb eval" behavior opposed to ":noweb yes".