From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: mark as done on a previous date? Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:40:32 +0100 Message-ID: <84r34iaflb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <84eg0p7gw3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOpYc-0000b5-4b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:41:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOpYZ-0004Ks-0f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:41:02 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=50028 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOpYY-0004Jt-Q4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:40:58 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOpYO-0006BA-2z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:40:48 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Interesting. I couldn't get yours to work as I expected either, and > decided to try =org-todo-yesterday=, and couldn't get _that_ to work as > I expected either, which I thought was strange so I dug a bit deeper. I > tested with =emacs -q foo.org= and added the following entry (I did this > on the 30th of December): > > ,---- > | * TODO Testing 123 > | SCHEDULED: <2016-12-27 Tue .+1m> > | :PROPERTIES: > | :STYLE: habit > | :END: > `---- > > After using =org-todo-yesterday= I ended up with: > > ,---- > | * TODO Testing 123 > | SCHEDULED: <2017-01-29 Sun .+1m> > | - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2016-12-30 Fri 16:29] > | :PROPERTIES: > | :STYLE: habit > | :LAST_REPEAT: [2016-12-30 Fri 16:29] > | :END: > `---- > > I now see (finally!) that the *re-scheduling* works as I would expect, > but the LAST_REPEAT and state change logging still uses the actual time. > I would have expected both those to use the 29th rather than the 30th as > well. Perhaps this is just my expectation that needs adjusting, but this > breaks org-habit's graphing of my consistency. Perhaps I just have to > get in the habit of ticking stuff off on the day I do them... :-) Hi Stig, I think your expectation is right. There is another thread in this mailing list about the same topic AFAICT. Hopefully something reliable will emerge. Ciao