From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: Timestamped items with M-RET Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:17:31 +0100 Message-ID: <84o9jnxays.fsf@gmail.com> References: <84zi37f38m.fsf@gmail.com> <87efkjdo1o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ex8u7-0007qN-K5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:17:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ex8u6-0001rH-O2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:17:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]:42538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ex8u6-0001pd-Fa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:17:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id s18so13853814wrg.9 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 03:17:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87efkjdo1o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:55:15 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Possibly you also like the feature to create list items including the >> current time with key M-RET when in such item. This is for creating >> lists like the following: >> >> - [2018-03-17 Sat 10:19] Write to the list. >> - [2018-03-17 Sat 10:22] Think about wording. > > Is `M-RET C-u C-u C-c !' that long to type? If you use it often enough > to want to extend `org-insert-item' for it, it should become fairly > quick. I guess you are right. >> This is similar to the functionality already available for timer >> items. (info "(org) Timers") > > Timers are precise to the second, so speed matters. OTOH, timestamps are > only precise to the minute. I like M-RET to be smart about its context. So it looks to me that we talk about personal affection here. The whole thing is just an option for everyone. Thanks!