From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: Editing elisp code block inserts spurious , before * Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: <84o90imgg2.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0WsM-0001sg-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:06:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0WsL-0005Ms-Ri for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:06:34 -0400 Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:40876 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0WsL-0005MN-Kp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:06:33 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0WsH-000yoR-Sw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:06:29 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi! Immanuel Litzroth writes: > Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and > what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See > > https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback > > Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > When editing this block with C- ' > > +BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :lexical t :tangle elisp.el > (defvar *a-var* "blah") > (defun v() > (interactive) > *a-var*) > #+END_SRC > > On return it adds a , before the *a-var* > > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :lexical t :tangle elisp.el > (defvar *a-var* "blah") > (defun v() > (interactive) > ,*a-var*) > #+END_SRC Confirmed. Possibly the "escaping" of the star can be refined. But is it worth the effort? Is there an issue apart from the cosmetic annoyance? Ciao, Marco