From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix: Emacs 25 fancy diary inclusion in agenda Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:43:42 +0200 Message-ID: <84iojoz4mp.fsf@tm6592.fritz.box> References: <84d2a0ypk7.fsf@tm6592.fritz.box> <87lhonx578.fsf@gmail.com> <84siiuj3l6.fsf@tm6592.fritz.box> <87d29yn5lu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <84r3yey3vj.fsf@tm6592.fritz.box> <87fveu5wl0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdcAa-0007Vn-Oh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdcAU-0002Tk-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:44:00 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdcAU-0002Tc-OY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:43:54 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XdcAT-0004KB-0C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:43:53 +0200 Received: from stgt-4d02fefd.pool.mediaways.net ([77.2.254.253]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:43:52 +0200 Received: from marcowahlsoft by stgt-4d02fefd.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:43:52 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Achim, Thanks for your corrections and hints. >> Patch pushed! > > It looks like that patch should have gone to maint rather than master Sorry for that. I was not aware that fixes should go to maint. I just naively took the first best branch (which was master) for applying the change. BTW: It looks like a good soul already merged the patch into the maint branch. > and please use a properly formatted commit message in the future: > > - The first line of the commit has been taken from the subject of your > post rather than being in the form that Org uses. > - The commit description itself will be shortened to unintelligible > gibberish in the Emacs Changelog since the text before the first blank > line doesn't actually tell what the change has been about. A formal error plus unintelligible gibberish. Hard to imagine how a commit message could be worse. I try to be more careful the next time. Thanks again, Marco -- http://www.wahlzone.de GPG: 0x0A3AE6F2