From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-read-date ignores hours?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:41:09 +0200
Message-ID: <84h83yr0wq.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m1tv805dir.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40156)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>) id 1iNYgH-0002OZ-3T
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:41:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>) id 1iNYgG-0002ke-20
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:41:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:50505)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>)
 id 1iNYgF-0002kA-Q7
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:41:16 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id q13so1808863wmj.0
 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1tv805dir.fsf@gmail.com> (Ag Ibragimov's message of "Tue, 22
 Oct 2019 20:47:24 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ag Ibragimov <agzam.ibragimov@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Ag,

> When I use (org-read-date t) and type something like "+2m" it works as expected, but for
> some reason if I type something like "+2h" it returns datetime with no
> changes. Expected - two hours in the future. Am I missing something?

AFAICS your expectation is not implemented.  See function
org-read-date-get-relative.

+1 for someone trying to implement this idea.


HTH,
-- 
Marco