From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org: Liberate org-property-action
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:06:35 +0100
Message-ID: <84fui4b93o.fsf@tm6592>
References: <84d1d8ho20.fsf@tm6592> <87d1d89y34.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34376)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cqzdy-0003Js-Nc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:06:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cqzdv-0004zQ-K3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:06:58 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37585 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1cqzdv-0004z0-Co
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:06:55 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cqzdg-0007Wf-GT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:06:40 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

>> This is a simple suggestion to improve function `org-property-action'.
>> Currently `org-property-action' errors when 'not at a property'.  But
>> this is unnecessary AFAICS.
>>
>> Without the restriction one can use the function to control any property
>> inclusive setting the very first property.
>>
>> Do I miss something (again)?
>
> LGTM.

Thanks for the review.

Let's do this.
-> DONE


Ciao