Re: [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

[Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com>]

Hi!

> Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io> writes:
>
>> Here is a translated example task from my .org file:
>>
>> *** TODO Check bank report
>>     SCHEDULED: <2000-02-10 Thu +1m>
>>
>>     Dated [2000-01-01 Sat +1m]
>>
>> The point of this “Dated” field being to tell me to which report I
>> should be looking, given I sometimes am a month late or so in checking
>> my reports, and just put them in the (physical) drawer as I receive
>> them.
>>
>> This “Dated” field is exactly what I would like to see updated when I
>> mark the task as done (like the SCHEDULED date), but it looks like it
>> doesn't move.
>
> Org didn't handle repeaters in inactive time stamps. This is now fixed
> (in master). Thank you.

AFAICT the performance of marking tasks done which contain *a lot* of
inactive timestams has degraded considerably with this change.

Example:

#v+
* TODO task
SCHEDULED: <2018-11-15 .+1d>
:PROPERTIES:
:STYLE:    habit
:LAST_REPEAT: [2018-11-14 16:26]
:END:

[2018-07-10 Tue 11:29]--[2018-07-10 Tue 12:10]
[2018-07-09 Mon 15:20]--[2018-07-09 Mon 15:23]
[2018-07-08 Sun 09:01]--[2018-07-08 Sun 09:20]
...
<hundreds of these lines>
...
[2013-07-08 Sun 09:01]--[2013-07-08 Sun 09:20]
#v-

Sorry for not having digged deeper into this issue yet.


Ciao,  Marco