From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: bug in org-habits Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:31 +0100 Message-ID: <84611j19hk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <84io5j1k5h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtbvB-0003cu-85 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:46:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztbv7-0008B0-6c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:46:45 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztbv6-0008An-W7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:46:41 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztbv5-0003Xl-HN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:39 +0100 Received: from hsi-kbw-37-49-33-188.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([37.49.33.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:39 +0100 Received: from marcowahlsoft by hsi-kbw-37-49-33-188.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:39 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com John Wiegley writes: >>>>>> Puneeth Chaganti writes: > >>> Actually there has been introduced a constraint on the ordering planning >>> lines and property drawers in 8.3. See http://orgmode.org/Changes.html.> >>> This at least invalidates to use PROPERTIES before SCHEDULED afaics. > >> Yes, that is correct and you can use the `org-repair-property-drawers` >> utility function provided to fix your org trees. > > I would very much like to see this constraint removed from 8.3. I have always > preferred having SCHEDULED before PROPERTIES, as this is how all my Org files > are arranged. Actually what you describe _is_ the expected order for the 8.3 files. > In fact, this one aspect of 8.3 has kept me at 8.2. I do not understand the > need for such an abitrary restriction. So this constraint on the order should not hold you back to move on to 8.3. I can report that in my personal org practice this constraint never got in my way. Further I can't imagine a use case when the user can benefit of a SCHEDULE line below a property drawer, but this might be a bit personal. I can say nothing about the technical view of having that constraint. Best regards, -- Marco Wahl GPG: 0x49010A040A3AE6F2