Re: Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?

[Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>]

Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:

> On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
> > 
> >> There is the following code block there:
> >>
> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
> >>   (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
> >>           '("per-file-class"
> >>              "\\documentclass{scrartcl}
> >>              [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
> >>              [EXTRA]"
> >>              ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
> >>              ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
> >>              ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")
> >>              ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}")
> >>              ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}")))
> >> #+end_src
> >>
> >> Is this still correct?  Or should this be :exports none instead of
> >> :results silent?
> >>
> > 
> > ``:results silent'' works for me and keeps the result from appearing in
> > the org buffer. I don't think :exports can do that - it can only affect
> > what's exported.
> > 
> > Nick
> 
> I must be doing something wrong then --- I had the :results silent and
> found the source block in verbatim in my latex export file....  Changing
> to :exports none made that go away for me.  Maybe that was a
> coincidence.  I will have to investigate further, I guess.
> 

No, you are not doing anything wrong: the default :exports value is
"code", so the code ends up in your export. ``:exports none'' keeps it
(and any results) from being exported.

OTOH, try evaluating (C-c C-c) the code block, with and without
``:results silent''. There is a behavior difference and *that* difference
is not affected by how you set :exports.

Nick