From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: Scope issue: "SCHEDULED/DEADLINE" in blocks are being evaluated Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:53:22 +0100 Message-ID: <841t9gjorx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <2016-01-15T15-10-01@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <84mvs6c1b4.fsf@gmail.com> <2016-01-17T10-09-57@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87mvs48itk.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKnly-0005Xr-GJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:53:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKnlu-00019o-Co for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:53:38 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKnlu-00019j-5f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:53:34 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aKnls-0004Bq-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:53:32 +0100 Received: from x5f701c3e.dyn.telefonica.de ([95.112.28.62]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:53:32 +0100 Received: from marcowahlsoft by x5f701c3e.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:53:32 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Karl Voit writes: > >> Unfortunately, this fix (or any other commit?) prevents my >> non-recurring tasks to be completed when I got "DEADLINE" or >> "SCHEDULED" in the body text within blocks or comments. > > Isn't this the this feature? The Org syntax¹ specifies: > Footnotes: > ¹ http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Clock,_Diary_Sexp_and_Planning IIUC the issue here is solely for dates contained within a block. The behavior of Org for those dates (in particular when a repeater like '+1w' is involved) on progressing the todo is unspecified AFAICS. Best regards, -- Marco Wahl GPG: 0x49010A040A3AE6F2