From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:48:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjydy8ny.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> <87txomz1j7.fsf@yandex.ru> <83li9yyyul.fsf@gnu.org> <87li9xu9y5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Return-path: In-reply-to: <87li9xu9y5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org > From: Achim Gratz > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:34:42 +0100 > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > In any case, doing the built-in packages this way (or something similar) > takes a lot of unecessary churn and merges out of the release process > and I would think that would be a clear advantage to everyone involved. I see that we have come a full circle, what with all this new blood pouring into Emacs development, and we are finally ready to repeat the failed experiment with dividing Emacs into "core" and "all the rest". Good luck (you will need it)!