From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ? Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:04:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83zhwedl2v.fsf__33737.4204922982$1537340691$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <531a7f93882cc0d5d09700457d06ea082f47569b.camel@flqt.fr> <83sh2ck42e.fsf@gnu.org> <87va73gn90.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <83efdqg32d.fsf@gnu.org> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2WYq-0003TI-N5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 03:06:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2WYo-000205-Kx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 03:06:08 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:39:49 -0400) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: rms@gnu.org Cc: rgm@gnu.org, n@flqt.fr, rjhorniii@gmail.com, 32722@debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, n@flqt.fr, rjhorniii@gmail.com, > 32722@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, > kaushal.modi@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:39:49 -0400 > > > While there are numerous references > > to GitHub and SourceForge in Emacs (and some components even nominally > > live there, by the way, eg CEDET, cc-mode...), it's rare (unique?) for > > running a GNU Emacs command to actually print "hey, go install > > something from this non-ethical repository to finish doing what you > > wanted to do". It's a different level of referencing. > > You've put your finger on the crucial point. > Just talking about something that is in GitHub is ok. > The problem is suggest users get it and run it. If that is the crucial point, then the recent change to Org already took care of that, and there should be no rush to convert Org to using htmlfontify, as this issue is now on the same level as the other references to GitHub. Right?