From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: bug#10125: RFE: require and load-path-shadowing Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:55:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83wqvisdxx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sj68eogm.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqvjd7qa.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bocvcx9f.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83ip72u89o.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehhqn1md.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8338y6txjh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu1Yy-0005B1-LR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:55:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu1Ys-0001SH-Ei for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:55:56 -0500 Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, 10125@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Achim Gratz , 10125@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:28:29 -0500 > > > IOW, do you expect the byte-compile instances to be different in any > > way from a fresh Emacs session invoked from the shell as "emacs -Q"? > > Yes, because the current Emacs may be a different executable than the > one the shell would run in response to "emacs -Q". And if we make sure the same executable is run (easy on Windows)? Are there any other differences?