From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:32:56 +0200
Message-ID: <83tw8cv6pj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAFyQvY16F7Vn0Wa=qV1g+HWWLV0cT7FaixLN8w7sJEAWJz9P3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2o9yp4qzn.fsf@newartisans.com> <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cedxw.fsf@newartisans.com> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cxlk9.fsf@RFC1918.na.baesystems.com>
	<87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <m2a8a5uwq2.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<m3y3xoyesg.fsf@stories>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50987)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1cZLG6-0000zq-4u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1cZLG2-0000wO-EL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <m3y3xoyesg.fsf@stories> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu,
	02 Feb 2017 13:10:07 +0100)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:10:07 +0100
> Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
> 	Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>,
> 	emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
> 	Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
> 
> If Django had traditionally always been distributed along with Python,
> and maintained in the Python repo, and the suggestion now would be to
> move Django to a part of the Python repo that very few developers look
> at, but Django would continue to be distributed with Python, and all
> Django bug reports would continue to go to the Python bug repository,
> and Python developers would continue to be responsible for QA and bug
> fixing of Django.

I believe the intent is to make it so that checking out and building
Emacs also checks out and builds all the packages that are intended to
be part of a release tarball.  If we indeed do that this way, there
will be no difference, QA-wise, between core packages and ELPA
packages that are logically part of an Emacs release.