From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:14:46 +0200
Message-ID: <83oapz3o89.fsf__10016.3671108477$1421345775$gmane$org@gnu.org>
References: <86mw5kktly.fsf@example.com>
	<mailman.17962.1421338747.1147.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
	<86lhl32a5e.fsf@example.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46504)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YBowl-0003gw-0Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YBowh-00022p-Mi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:06 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19606.B19606.142134568130630@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <86lhl32a5e.fsf@example.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Fabrice Niessen <fni-news@pirilampo.org>
Cc: 19606@debbugs.gnu.org

> From: Fabrice Niessen <fni-news@pirilampo.org>
> Cc: 19606@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:04:13 +0100
> 
> > Thanks, but what do you expect us to do with this report, without any
> > information whatsoever regarding your customizations?
> 
> I thought that, thanks to the backtrace, you could find the culprit, or
> reduce the scope of the search, as you often succeed to do.

But you didn't even show the backtrace from the main (a.k.a. "Lisp")
thread.  Your backtrace is from thread 15, whereas the main thread is
thread 1.  You need to type "thread 1" before "backtrace" to provide
the (possibly) interesting backtrace.