From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:34:59 +0200
Message-ID: <83k28v2zj0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAFyQvY16F7Vn0Wa=qV1g+HWWLV0cT7FaixLN8w7sJEAWJz9P3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2o9yp4qzn.fsf@newartisans.com> <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cedxw.fsf@newartisans.com> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cxlk9.fsf@RFC1918.na.baesystems.com>
	<87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <m2a8a5uwq2.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<87a8a4ees0.fsf@engster.org> <m28tpoca3k.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<87poiz2raf.fsf@engster.org> <m2wpcwm8i6.fsf@newartisans.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45312)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ccwAv-0005lE-Jf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ccwAu-0000IK-Kj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <m2wpcwm8i6.fsf@newartisans.com> (message from John Wiegley on
	Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Cc: deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk

> From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800
> Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
> 	Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>,
> 	emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
> 	Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
> 
> I hear your other points, so I'm curious now as to what more people think
> about this who work on Emacs core: Do you want more modularity with regard
> ELPA, or does the monolithic model work better for you?

AFAIU, the main motivation for the "drive to ELPA" comes from
developers of individual packages, not from those working on the core
(even though some package developers also work on core).