From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#10125: RFE: require and load-path-shadowing
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:15:31 +0200
Message-ID: <83ip72u89o.fsf__27293.0686864585$1357978592$gmane$org@gnu.org>
References: <87sj68eogm.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <mthamoy574.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvvcb47bs0.fsf-monnier+emacs__21035.4545656175$1357869514$gmane$org@gnu.org>
	<87wqvjd7qa.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<jwvvcb34qjg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87bocvcx9f.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<jwvlibz2v6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44190)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TtwFu-0003x8-J0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:15:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TtwFr-0006vG-HI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:15:54 -0500
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.10125.B10125.135797853324484@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <jwvlibz2v6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, 10125@debbugs.gnu.org

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:52:33 -0500
> Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org
>=20
> >>>> I guess we could fork Emacs early on and keep this second proc=
ess
> >>>> around as a "process from which to generate new clean slates".
> >>> I've been thinking about something like this for a while=E2=
=80=A6 if it worked
> >>> at least as well as starting a new Emacs instance on all platfo=
rms, I'd
> >>> favor this approach.
> >> IIUC "fork" is not really an option for w32.
> > For the intended application spawn should work as well?
>=20
> Could be: depends on the precise semantics of spawn, which I don't =
know.

I'm barely following this thread, so please tell what semantics do yo=
u
need, and I will then try figuring out whether spawn does what you
need.