From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Giovanni Ridolfi <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:10:03 +0200
Message-ID: <83ehxzsxuc.fsf@yahoo.it>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <80obx6vniu.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87vcrdyfhy.fsf@gmail.com> <201110250914.29233.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<80zkgptrm0.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ipnd3zbr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<3709.1319557336@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58646)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1RJ3FE-0005vq-Ic
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:10:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1RJ3F6-0000cP-Qx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:10:12 -0400
Received: from nm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.219]:42322)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1RJ3F6-0000b6-HE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:10:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3709.1319557336@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's
	message of "Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:42:16 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
>> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
>> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
>> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
>> win.
>> 
>
> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that easily.
> I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the BDFL, the
> NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the democratic rules
> some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's with me?

+1 srcname

:-)
Power to the people! Democracy forever!

Giovanni /who has not used babel yet.