From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Giovanni Ridolfi <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: New backend for org-agenda:
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:31:04 +0200
Message-ID: <83d3h5nko7.fsf@yahoo.it>
References: <20110710154117.881A213C51B@vps1.kiwanami.net>
	<87fwmcar0u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20110716162238.DC9D213C517@vps1.kiwanami.net>
	<87d3h7w5nd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20110720075047.13A8013C4EB@vps1.kiwanami.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32959)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1QjWrm-0007xu-9D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:31:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1QjWrg-00009s-WD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:31:09 -0400
Received: from nm16.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.190]:35339)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1QjWrg-00009T-Cc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:31:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20110720075047.13A8013C4EB@vps1.kiwanami.net> (SAKURAI Masashi's
	message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:50:46 +0900")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: SAKURAI Masashi <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net>
Cc: bzg@altern.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

SAKURAI Masashi <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net> writes:

Hi Masashi,
>
> At Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:06:14 +0200,
> Bastien wrote:
>> :
>> > I'm sure that the caching mechanism is useful, but I'm not sure that
>> > we should do it with paying the large cost of rewrite whole codes.
>> 
>> FWIW, this is a two separate steps process: 1) write a usable cache, 
>> then 2) re-implement (parts of) the agenda by using it.
>> 
>> I think (1) could be interesting /per-se/ and if it helps calfw, then
>> it's even more interesting.
>
> What does '/per-se/' mean ?

:-)
it is Latin, an ancient  *European* language
it means:
- 'In itself' 
- Also "by itself" 
or:
- Without referring to anything else, intrinsically, 
  taken without qualifications, 

> Excuse me for asking a trivial word.
You should excuse our Eurocentrism ;-) 

cheers,
Giovanni