From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stardiviner Subject: Re: The new function org-insert-structure-template is not following option org-babel-capitalize-example-region-markers Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:11:23 +0800 Message-ID: <83d10b27-e47c-1999-adf3-212e1ab2f947@gmail.com> References: <87ineim40w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDN8m-0002fF-LN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:11:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDN8j-0002J5-8q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:11:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]:55825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDN8j-0002Im-2W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:11:29 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 207so6030273pgc.12 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:11:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([119.28.89.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm23865923pfi.165.2017.11.10.20.11.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:11:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ineim40w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Yes, sure, currently the Git master branch last commit does not support this new option yet. Hope be added in next patch. Thanks really. On 11/11/2017 01:34 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > "numbchild@gmail.com" writes: > >> RT. >> Hope Org-mode can fix this issue. > It looks like that option has been obsoleted by > `org-babel-uppercase-example-markers'. I added that in and it compiled > and tested fine, so I guess it's available. I can make that part of the > next patch. > >