From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Giovanni Ridolfi <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New clocktable-feature: Structure clocktable by tags
 rather than by hierarchy
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:10:11 +0200
Message-ID: <83aaqoda4s.fsf@yahoo.it>
References: <AANLkTimGqugmEPqNmXcNVnaPGWwNYOaV_Yvp_koqg5Pm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1ABFE7B5-846A-4366-B2AF-311C6B8E7D82@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTink1gfpc3undRq3t4R6x98zYJDEKYhrlsgO5Lmk@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57226 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQd1A-0006bA-C4
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:10:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1OQd18-0006bd-MR
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:10:11 -0400
Received: from slim-2c.inet.it ([213.92.5.123]:50959)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1OQd18-0006bO-CZ
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:10:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTink1gfpc3undRq3t4R6x98zYJDEKYhrlsgO5Lmk@mail.gmail.com>
	(B. Grobauer's message of "Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:26:55 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: B Grobauer <bgrobauer@googlemail.com>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

B Grobauer <bgrobauer@googlemail.com> writes:

>> Does your mechanism see inherited tags?
>
> Yes -- in the sample file, for example, tag inheritance
> is used to mark all sub-nodes of the two top-level trees
> for "Project A" and "Project B" as pertaining to
> those projects, respectively.

Feature request: Is it possible to check also for properies 
and not only for tag?

we can add a special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG

Rationale:
In my setup I have a remember template where I write the task I'm doing.
with some information e.g.:

** reading bibliography
   CLOCK: [2010-06-21 lun 09:24]
  :PROPERTIES:
  :ID: lab            
  :Type:expected
  :People: Giovanni
  :Location: computer
  :Connection: nil
  :CLOCKTAG:PV Project
  :Comment:  
  :END:

If the function checks also the :PROPERTIES: drawer and the existence of
the special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG I can keep my setup and exploit this
marvellous new feature.

If it's too complicated I will use the tags ;-)

TIA

Giovanni