From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Worg: common #+MACRO definitions Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:32:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83DE58CB-9460-456A-A56C-DD09611C8700@gmail.com> References: <1254702207.8436.42.camel@beteigeuze> <477C7CE1-81FA-4754-AF26-01A6A3D1D151@gmail.com> <87my461geh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1254748764.5788.5.camel@beteigeuze> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mung1-0006me-5y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Munfw-0006lb-Ew for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57883 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Munfw-0006lY-8z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com ([209.85.219.223]:47807) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Munfv-0005N2-KP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:27 -0400 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so2718957ewy.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:32:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1254748764.5788.5.camel@beteigeuze> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: sebastian_rose@gmx.de Cc: Bastien , Orgmode Mailing List On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Sebastian wrote: > Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien: >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>>> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?) >>>> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those >>>> macros? That way we could use those boxes in all >>>> our files, and they all would look the same, even >>>> if changed. worg/macros.org ??? >>> >>> I would say no problem! Just create it. Bastien, any objections? >> >> Sure, no objection! > > But we would need to exclude it from the export, which I cannot do. Why? It will create macros.php, yes, but no link to that file will exist, and nobody should ever see that. - Carsten > > > > Sebastian