From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Printing in indent mode Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:14:21 +0530 Message-ID: <81zkhm4dy2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <817h4rih7a.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Yi3-0002jj-FU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:44:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Yhw-0001MA-6T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:44:43 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:47412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Yhw-0001M0-3y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:44:36 -0400 Received: by gya6 with SMTP id 6so1589461gya.0 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Jarmo Hurri's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:50:02 +0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jarmo Hurri Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jarmo Hurri writes: > Jambunathan K writes: > >>> Is there a way to print the document tree in indent mode so that the >>> hidden stars would not show up in the printed version? >> >> Don't you think exporting the buffer to say pdf is a better option >> than printing the buffer directly? > > That would be very nice, but I do not know how to do this for a > hierarchical list so that the result would look like a list. I tried > org-export-as-pdf, but it gives me an output that is far from a list: > the result is a complete document, with a table of contents, section > numbering and each item in the list either as a section or a subsection. Please post an example org file and the hierarchical list that you want to export. Also post a png image or a screenshot of what the output should look like. I strongly believe there is a way to do what you want without resorting to postscript printing. Have you tried exporting to ASCII - C-c C-e a - and print that buffer instead? > -- > > Jarmo Hurri > > > --