From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LaTeX-export to ACM SIG Proceedings format
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:59:42 +0530
Message-ID: <81ty08g3vt.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <2012-04-24T22-00-37@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<m1vckox1lx.fsf@tsdye.com> <2012-04-25T00-12-21@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41360)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SMoFI-0005W0-6K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:30:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SMoFG-0000XT-58
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:30:03 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:54688)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SMoFF-0000Ud-Rv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:30:02 -0400
Received: by dadz8 with SMTP id z8so1516902dad.38
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2012-04-25T00-12-21@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message
	of "Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:14:11 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:

> * Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>> Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:
>>
>>> Maybe it might be a cool idea to work on this template together and
>>> publish it on Worg? I can imagine that several people are trying to
>>> meet those ACM template requirements ...
>>
>> This seems like a good idea.  Would it be possible to target Nicolas
>> Goaziou's experimental LaTeX exporter, instead of the old exporter?
>
> Since I was using the PDF/LaTeX export just to make quick and dirty
> files to send other people or pretty print, I was not aware that
> there is another LaTeX exporter.
>
> What would be the consequence of choosing the new one?

This should be obvious.  It will make it better.
--