From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ggggJambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BABEL] Speed keys
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:43:34 +0530
Message-ID: <81pqwt1d3l.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <814oe53co3.fsf@gmail.com> <8762yleei5.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44586 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orz7Q-0002d7-9m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:13:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1Orz7P-0003UU-6h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:13:44 -0400
Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:58861)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1Orz7P-0003UJ-0y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:13:43 -0400
Received: by pwj6 with SMTP id 6so1167733pwj.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8762yleei5.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Sat, 04
	Sep 2010 07:14:55 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


    >> Is it possible Speed Keys (Refer Org Manual - Sec. 15.3) for
    >> Babel blocks?
    >> 

    Eric> Hi Jambunathan, That sounds like a good idea.  I suppose
    Eric> initially the speed keys should just mirror the babel key map?

Exactly. 

As long as the cursor is on a #+begin_src (and/or #+end_src), one need
not bother about typing C-c C-v. So a keypress 'n' would do what C-c C-v
n would do.

More importantly emerging new sequences like, C-c C-v C-x TAB could be
composed as

1. Push a mark (C-SPC) [Optional]

2. Move to babel guard line using user preferred method [See my other
   post on the list]

3. C-x TAB

One of the problems with C-c C-v prefix is that I tend to forget it if I
revisit Babel say after a week's time. (Not nitpicking here!). The
reason is that I simply couldn't contrive a convenient menemonic that
would make me recollect C-v. So jumping to the babel guard line and
issuing the needed command is a good fall back option.

Jambunathan K.