From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Not merging org-lparse, org-xhtml & org-odt to the core Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:53:12 +0530 Message-ID: <81obzfuk7z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81ei0e6vol.fsf@gmail.com> <20110822094816.0f61f019@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> <80k4a5ab4f.fsf@somewhere.org> <81zkiz8zdw.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty97hyej.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBZ8-0008Rl-HG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:24:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBZ7-0008WQ-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:24:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:34946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBZ7-0008WA-49 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:24:13 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so832796pzk.17 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:24:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ty97hyej.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:16 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Please stay away from the discussion. > [1] Another example of the Jambunathan style: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42544/focus=42563 You are mixing stlye with intent. style != intent. Read that again. The intent of hte post is to prod him to post ONLY when he can afford to post. I resent when someone relies on Free Software but suffixes every bug report he files with "No I cannot add more". I can show Samuel's posts which are detailed and which an average poster wouldn't have patience to write. I don't want him to file detailed bug reports. He simply has to remove his signature statement which repeatedly brings focus to what he cannot do and not what he has already brought to the table. When you are on internet you don't have to declare who you are or what you are endowed with. My contributions are non-trivial and useful. Bastien or Thomas or even Carsten (in the post that you point to) are taking a balanced opinion. They are taking a position which would take the discussion forward. You are hell bent on sabotaging the discussion. ps: Please stay away from the discussion. You don't have what it takes to generate a consensus. Jambunathan K.