From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:14:07 +0530 Message-ID: <81livt1e3c.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjTKT-0007Ba-Fy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:44:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjTKN-0006vm-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:44:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:51410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjTKM-0006vb-Se for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:44:27 -0400 Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so55118pvc.0 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:44:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Thomas Renkert's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:10:11 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thomas Renkert Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > The biggest advantage, IMO, is the aspect of self-organization: The biggest diasadvantage would be fragmentation of information. All information needs to have authoritative sources and archives. I believe the info manual, GNU mailing list and the Orgmode.org domain (of which Worg is but a part) are the right place for such archival references. I don't think anyone would object to having a secondary marketplace for trading of orgmode related tips and tricks. Jambunathan K. --