From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:47:28 +0530
Message-ID: <81ipv9g0qv.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20110322051038.21655c80@kuru.homelinux.net>
	<80d3lj9wj6.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<20110322053134.669127e9@kuru.homelinux.net>
	<8999.1300804510@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<20110322160814.227fc53f@bhishma.homelinux.net>
	<27844.1300836065@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <87ipv9gbst.fsf@gnu.org>
	<7864.1300892560@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<m3vcz9248i.fsf@e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk>
	<8930.1300898540@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58587 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2Scv-0002Zj-JF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:17:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1Q2Scu-0004fD-Mj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:17:49 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:56642)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1Q2Scu-0004f0-F9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:17:48 -0400
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so11549433iwl.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8930.1300898540@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's
	message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:42:20 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Lawrence Mitchell <wence@gmx.li>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


>> For example, I don't know if the docbook backend explicitly
>> writes section numbers in, or if the sectioning is left to the
>> stylesheet.  If the latter, can I mark sections as ones that
>> should be numbered and ones that shouldn't?
>> 
>
> And I'm sure Jambunathan will take care of the odt exporter.

I think from odt side of things users are very likely to turn off
numbering and toc altogether and be more than happy to give finishing
touches with automatic outline numbering facility and automatic toc
generation facility offered by the viewers.

Currently the TOC and section-numbering generated by the odt exporter is
artificial. i.e., It looks like section numbers and TOC but the
underlying xml elements are not spitted out by the odt exporter.

Considering that the odt exporter is new I believe there is some
flexibility on my side to reject certain features as too niche for a
first level release :-).

Jambunathan K.