From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-capture (lost PATCH?)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:09:42 +0530
Message-ID: <81d3ryv5v5.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <81hbha3arh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocbi4n41.fsf@fastmail.fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58270 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0Rz4-0005ow-43
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:40:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1P0Rz2-0005Hh-PS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:40:05 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:43218)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1P0Rz2-0005HV-C7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:40:04 -0400
Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so8803500iwn.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87ocbi4n41.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Mon, 27
	Sep 2010 22:29:18 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

Matt

>> I had proposed a patch to org-capture in this thread.
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-08/msg01152.html
>>
>> The patch has neither been rejected nor accepted. I am a bit concerned
>> that it might have been lost.
>
> It's currently on patchwork with the status of "deferred":
>
> http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/246/

Thanks. 

Reassuring to know that this is still under the radar.

>From the patchwork server side, two things could be considered:

1. Enhance the web interface[1] to show *all* *not DONE* items.

   - http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/list/

2. Generate an automated reply to a submitter of the patch giving him an
   URL to the patch. This will enable under the hood access to the patch
   state.

Either or both of 1 and 2 would avoid anxiety on contributor's side
particularly the newer ones.

Thanks,
Jambunathan K.