From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Use custom program to process LaTeX fragments? Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:10:45 +0530 Message-ID: <817h8lme02.fsf@gmail.com> References: <184877.30931.qm@web120716.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <7801.3063561686$1308274226@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXO3Y-0006gU-Vh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:41:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXO3X-0003ez-Hb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:41:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:59873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXO3X-0003es-3h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:41:07 -0400 Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so1832307pvc.0 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:41:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7801.3063561686$1308274226@news.gmane.org> (Uriel Avalos's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:28:44 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Uriel Avalos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Uriel Avalos writes: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) > amscopub-mail@yahoo.com wrote: > >> Currently, whenever you export to HTML, you have 3 options for processing LaTeX >> fragments: (1) dvipng, (2) jsmath, (3) or leave it as is. >> >> >> Is it possible to use an arbitrary program to process LaTeX fragments? >> >> What I want to do is use a commandline converter to turn the LaTeX fragments >> directly into MathML. This way the final HTML document already has the correct >> MathML without the need to use javascript. (Why? I use princexml to convert that >> HTML file to a hi-quality PDF. JSmath is no good for that.) >> > > anyone? You are interested in a solution but not interested in engaging in a conversation. It seems strange to me. Honestly I could have cooked up something ... It would help if you give us summary of what princexml does, how you intend to use it, how mature the codebase is and how it compares to the tool I mentioned etc etc etc. You need to engage if you are interested in a solution. Jambunathan K. > > --