From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug] Tables in lists not exported to ODT
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:35:00 +0530
Message-ID: <811uqqrjab.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ipkfu8b5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87lipbda63.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<81aa5n8hnt.fsf@gmail.com> <87obu24s2d.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<814nvr57n1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty3q3gqw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41309)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1RpDxs-00083Y-6R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:05:20 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1RpDxm-00037x-Sh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:05:15 -0500
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:51842)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1RpDxm-00037t-Kp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:05:10 -0500
Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so5416667iad.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:05:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87ty3q3gqw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Fri, 20
	Jan 2012 08:44:39 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


> I find the behaviour of floating frames in word processors to be
> somewhat unpredictable and difficult to control, but that could simply
> be me! ;-)

You are not alone.
See https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40879

--