From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: PDF file was not produced! Too deeply nested!??
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:36:47 +0200
Message-ID: <80sjf2j34g.fsf@somewhere.org>
References: <801umnj5yn.fsf@somewhere.org> <5355.1337000954@alphaville>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org

Hi Nick,

Nick Dokos wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> With that 4-th level (far from 6!), the compilation simply ends in error.
>>
>> Anyone understanding why this happens?
>
> Apparently the FAQ is wrong: 4 will compile, 5 will not - e.g. the following
> will not compile with my setup:
>
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> \begin{itemize}
> \item foo
>   \begin{itemize}
>   \item bar
>     \begin{itemize}
>     \item baz
>       \begin{itemize}
>       \item hunoz
>         \begin{itemize}
>         \item hukerz
>         \end{itemize}
>       \end{itemize}
>     \end{itemize}
>   \end{itemize}
> \end{itemize}
> \end{document}

Confirmed...

> That's probably part of the explanation - the extra frame enclosing the
> nested list in your case might have something to do with the rest but that's
> purely a guess.

Then, yes, it seems that, somehow, the frametitle is eating 1 nesting level,
leaving just maximum 3 indentation levels for the lists.

One can say that 3 nesting levels is enough for slides (even if the above was
a real case: compiling slides from a colleague), so don't spend time on trying
to understand was the limit is 3 and not 4 levels (and not 6, as falsely
adverted in the FAQ).

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban