From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: Babel, Python and UTF-8 Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:05:32 +0100 Message-ID: <80oc94szxv.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> References: <87fwuhas6t.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxoo9r95.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc94f2yy.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pk7yrm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Eric and Dan, "Eric Schulte" wrote: > Dan Davison writes: >> "Eric Schulte" writes: >>> >>> I've just pushed up a new prefix header argument. >> >> "preamble" might be a better name? or "header"? prefix makes me think of >> adding a string onto the front of a string[1]; > > Absolutely, "prefix" was just the most obvious to me and I certainly > don't claim that makes it the most obvious choice globally :) > > I would lean against "header" since we already talk about "header > arguments", but I think "preamble" is an improvement. Does anyone have > a better suggestion? I second Dan's comment, and fully am in favor of preamble... Of course, the= n, one might ask for postamble=C2=A0;-) What about shebang? Isn't it a preamble as well? Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode