Re: Standardized code block syntax and Property Accumulation merged into Master

["Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Eric,

Eric Schulte wrote:
> The standard-code-block-syntax branch has been merged into the master
> branch of the git repository.  This brings two much discussed changes to
> Org-mode, first a standard set of keywords for code blocks and second
> the ability to accumulate properties by appending a "+" to the end of
> the property name.  For much more information on both of these changes
> see the relevant commits [1] and [2] respectively.  A function for
> updating existing Org-mode files to use the new standardized code block
> keywords is inline below [3], additionally I've updated my collection of
> Org-mode code block scraps [4].

Nice to see it's finally in!

However, I have to report a _tiny_ feature of applying your function:

> [3]  Function to update Org-mode buffers to use the new code block syntax.
>      (defun update-org-buffer ()
>        "Update an Org-mode buffer to the new data, code block and call line syntax."
>        (interactive)
>        (save-excursion
>          (flet ((to-re (lst) (concat "^[ \t]*#\\+" (regexp-opt lst t)
>                                      "\\(\\[\\([[:alnum:]]+\\)\\]\\)?\\:[ \t]*"))
>                 (update (re new)
>                         (goto-char (point-min))
>                         (while (re-search-forward re nil t)
>                           (replace-match new nil nil nil 1))))
>            (let ((old-re (to-re '("RESULTS" "DATA" "SRCNAME" "SOURCE")))
>                  (lob-re (to-re '("LOB")))
>                  (case-fold-search t))
>              (update old-re "name")
>              (update lob-re "call")))))

When run on a buffer containing:

    #+property: var  foo=1

    #+begin_src emacs-lisp
     foo
    #+end_src

    #+results:
    : 1

it will translate `#+results' to `#+name':

    #+property: var  foo=1

    #+begin_src emacs-lisp
     foo
    #+end_src

    #+name:
    : 1

Further evaluations of that *un-named* code block will leave the `#+name'
line.

To get back the expected `#+results' line, you have to manually remove that
results line, and re-evaluate the code block.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban